About this site

  • : le blog beingskeptical par : Frank
  • beingskeptical
  • : Politique
  • : Leave all your biases home and try to look at current events with an objective eye, not through the disinformation given to you by corporate media and politicians. If you manage to do that, you're welcome to come and talk. Israel/Palestine being the main
  • Recommander ce blog
  • Retour à la page d'accueil
  • Contact

Calendar

Décembre 2009
L M M J V S D
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28 29 30 31      
<< < > >>

Search

Lundi 29 octobre 2007 1 29 10 2007 14:26
The importance of a failed summit
By Gideon Levy

Do not belittle the Annapolis summit. Despite all the prophecies of failure, justified as they are, this summit could still make an important contribution to the history of Israeli-Arab negotiations: For the first time, it will become crystal-clear who aspires toward peace and, more important, who flees from it as if from fire.

Israel is going to Annapolis as if by force. The prime minister's hands are tied. If he were to dare to raise the core issues, which are the only thing to be discussed there, then his political fate would be sealed. Shas and Yisrael Beiteinu have already announced that in such an event, they will bring down his government. One can assume that Ehud Olmert, the survivor, is aware of this danger. Despite the lofty agreements that he will achieve - or not, it will seem as if his biweekly talks with Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas never took place. Eli Yishai won't permit it, Avigdor Lieberman is making threats and even Ehud Barak is making sour faces. An Israel that refuses to discuss the core issues is an Israel that does not want peace. There's no other way to put it.

All this is made even more serious by the context in which the summit is being held: Israel never had as few excuses for evading progress toward peace, the ambient climate was never more conducive to progress. The terror card cannot be played again, because the terror has abated. Qassams landing on Sderot and a childish assassination attempt are not a reason to evade the peace process. This low level of terror will, unfortunately, continue to accompany Israeli-Palestinian relations for years to come. We must learn to live with it, and above all recognize that it will not stop in the absence of an agreement that will put an end to the occupation.
There is more. The security issue is much greater today on the Palestinian side. Israel can no longer continue to mouth slogans about security, after seven years in which it killed 4,267 Palestinians, 861 of them children and teens, in comparison to 467 Israelis who were killed, according to data from B'Tselem.

Another excuse that no longer washes is the "no partner" one. Israel has never had an easier peace partner than Mahmoud Abbas. True, he represents barely half the Palestinian people - Olmert represents an even smaller proportion - and true, it would be preferable if the Palestinian team going to Annapolis were to include Hamas, but that is no reason not to try. We destroyed Yasser Arafat as a partner - and the time has come to regret it - but we can no longer use the weakness of his successor as an excuse: Israel did all it could to create that situation. The Arab world, too, is more open to Israel and to peace than ever. Israel is methodically destroying the Arab League's resolution and the Saudi peace plan, but they are still on the table and sending out an unprecedented message of hope to Israel.

The real role of the United States will also be exposed at the summit: No other agent is as capable of making as great a contribution to advancing peace in the region as is Washington, but in the absence of any pressure on Israel, the sad impression is that even the Americans will not go out of their way to achieve peace. Annapolis is shaping up as no more than a perfunctory gesture from America. We tried, the Americans will say. But, of course, it is not a genuine attempt.

All the cards will be shown at Annapolis, and that is no small thing. The world will see and judge, Israelis will see and decide: Do we genuinely want peace?
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Palestine
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 29 octobre 2007 1 29 10 2007 14:25
Palestinian soccer team misses World Cup qualifier, blames Israel
By The Associated Press

The Palestinian soccer team said it missed its World Cup qualifying match at Singapore because of Israeli travel restrictions.

The team didn't show for Sunday's game because 18 of its players and officials live in the Gaza Strip, according to Jamal Abu Hasheesh, spokesman for the Palestinian soccer federation.

The Gaza Strip has been under tight control since the Islamic militant Hamas took power by force in June. Last month, Israel declared Gaza hostile territory and said it would only permit humanitarian hardship cases to leave.
Abu Hasheesh said the 18 team members didn't receive Israeli permits to leave Gaza for the game.

The federation has asked FIFA to reschedule the match. FIFA officials were not immediately available for comment.

Shadi Yassin, a spokesman for the Israeli military's office in charge of coordination with Gaza, said he was looking into the matter
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Palestine
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Lundi 29 octobre 2007 1 29 10 2007 14:22
EU warns Israel not to impose 'collective punishment' in Gaza
By Amos Harel and Avi Issacharoff, Haaretz Correspondents

The European Union cautioned Israel on Monday against imposing "collective punishment" against the 1.5 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip by cutting of delivery of fuel supplies to the territory.

The protest came one day after Israel began reducing fuel supplies as part of a new sanctions policy in what Israel says is a response to Palestinian rocket fire on Israeli towns from the Hamas-controlled coastal enclave.

"I think collective punishment is never a solution," Benita Ferrero-Waldner, the EU's commissioner for external relations, told reporters in Jerusalem.
She said she would raise the issue in meetings with Israeli leaders during her visit. Israel continues to allow money into the Gaza Strip from the West Bank despite increased sanctions, including the fuel reductions, on the Strip. Israel agreed last week to another shipment of funds into Gaza via the Erez crossing.

Security forces said the money was intended for salaries Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas has committed to pay.

The tens of millions of shekels will pay tens of thousands of PA workers and Fatah activists' salaries. Hamas has thus far not blocked the transfer.

The Gaza Strip is experiencing a dwindling of shekels following the shutdown of some Israeli banks and the desire of others to stop activities in Gaza. Last week the Bank of Israel Governor Stanley Fischer asked Bank Hapoalim to postpone by two months its intention to stop activity in the Strip.

Finance Minister Roni Bar-On and his Egyptian counterpart, Youssef Boutros-Ghali, suggested at an International Monetary Fund meeting in Washington last week that Israel could transfer shekels to banks in Egypt for transfer to Gaza. This would address the concerns of Israeli banks that the funds they transfer would reach terror organizations.

However security officials said recently that they opposed the plan because they would lose all control over the transfers and the money would reach the terror organizations indirectly.

Israel began Sunday to decrease its fuel supply to the Gaza Strip as part of its policy to intensify sanctions against the Hamas government.

The plan to disrupt the electricity supply to Gaza has not yet been implemented in light of a petition to the High Court of Justice Sunday by the Arab-Israeli legal advocacy center Adalah against the disruption.

The Palestinian Fuel Authority in the Gaza Strip reported Sunday that the shortfall in fuel supplies was noticeable. According to the authority, the supply of diesel has been cut from a normal level of 350,000 liters per day to 200,000 liters. Similarly, the supply of gasoline, which normally stands at 150,000 liters per day, has dropped to about 90,000 liters. Ahmed Ali, deputy chairman of the Fuel Authority, told the press Sunday that shortages would be felt in a few days, since there was sufficient fuel in Gaza Strip storage for another four days. However, Palestinians joined long lines Sunday to stock up on fuel before the imminent shortages.

Dor Alon, the Israeli firm supplying fuel to the Palestinians, acknowledged it had cut down on diesel and gasoline to the Gaza Strip on instructions from the defense establishment.

Next week, another reduction will go into effect. The Sufa crossing in the southern Gaza Strip was also closed down Sunday for an unlimited period. The passage had been operating since the Hamas takeover of the Strip in June instead of the Karni crossing that was closed down due to terror alerts. Most of the merchandise moved to the Gaza
Strip  about 100 to 120 truckloads a day went through the Sufa crossing.

Merchandise will now be able to enter the Gaza Strip only at Kerem Shalom, which has a much smaller capacity of up to 55 trucks a day.
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Palestine
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Vendredi 26 octobre 2007 5 26 10 2007 15:28
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Reports from NGO, Charities....
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Jeudi 25 octobre 2007 4 25 10 2007 10:04

A Palestinian Camp in Lebanon is Burned and Destroyed, the Media is Banned, and the World is Silent

What Happened in Nahr Al Bared?

By MICHAEL BIRMINGHAM

Nahr Al Bared is a Palestinian refugee camp in the north of Lebanon which has been home to about 40,000 Palestinian people, most of whom are the children and grandchildren of those who left Palestine in 1948. Some like Abu Mohammad were born in Palestine. He was ten years old, and next year it will be sixty years since the formation of the State of Israel was achieved through the ethnic cleansing of Abu Mohammad and so many others from their home in Palestine. He told me this as the two of us sat alone in the pitch dark while rats ran around beside our chairs at his house. As I left he went in to sleep alone amongst ashes and rodents, with no neighbours around him, trying to believe that he still has something left to protect.

Between May and September of this year, a ferocious battle took place between the Lebanese Army and a small armed group known as Fatah Al Islam. From the first the day, the Lebanese Army surrounded the camp and fired in artillery, maintaining this course for months. Most of the residents of the camp were forced to leave with the clothes on their backs within the first three days. As the number of young Lebanese soldiers killed and horribly maimed rose through the battle, Lebanon became awash with patriotism and grief, any questioning of the army taboo.

Something terrible has been done to the residents of Nahr al Bared, and the Lebanese people are being spared the details. Over the past two weeks, since the camp was partly reopened to a few of its residents, many of us who have been there have been stunned by a powerful reality. Beyond the massive destruction of the homes from three months of bombing, room after room, house after house have been burned. Burned from the inside. Amongst the ashes on the ground, are the insides of what appear to have been car tyres. The walls have soot dripping down from what seems clearly to have been something flammable sprayed on them. Rooms, houses, shops, garages --all blackened ruins, yet having had no damage from bombing or battle. They were burned deliberately by people entering and torching them.

How many we do not know, it is too large for a few people to comprehensively assess. But finding an un-bombed house or a business that has not been torched is very hard indeed.

Why did this happen? Why have the people whose entire life's work is to be found in ashes on the floor of these burned out homes, not been given any information about this--not a word? Each day new people return to find that this is what has happened to their homes.

It is not just the burning of houses. Cars that residents were ordered to leave behind in the first days of the battle have been smashed up. Mopeds and TVs and all that ordinary people value, also broken up. Fridge after fridge with bullets through them. All of this clearly done from inside the houses, not from any outside battle.

People returning to their homes sit outside alone on the ground. Stunned. When you ask them to bring you into their houses, they tell you, person after person, of how their valuables were stolen. Even where the valuables were well hidden, everything was ransacked and valuables found. Explosives were used to get through locked doors or to open safes. Items that people have had stolen include everything from clothes to cars. That which has not been burned, which was not smashed, which was of value seems to have vanished. Where?

This camp was strictly out of bounds to the Palestinian people. They could not have done this. Who did this and why must surely be investigated before more vital evidence has disappeared. A small amount of this may be attributable to Fatal al-Islam fighters. But there is clear evidence that some elements of the army acted improperly.

On the inside walls of many, many houses, are written slogans. Everything from proud soldiers noting army units, to profoundly racist, offensive slogans against Palestinian people. Many families have found some of their belongings in nearby houses. Faeces are on some mattresses and floors.

Every day that goes by more families return to the camp. Within hours, they have swept up and cleared away ashes and debris, so that they can try to imagine where to begin again. Mattresses with faeces are being burned. Journalists are still prohibited from the camp. Cameras are illegal there. Human rights groups have not entered. Every day that goes by, more evidence is lost.

For those of us who lived in nearby Baddawi refugee camp during the battle, this follows from months of people from Nahr al Bared telling stories of torture and abuse at checkpoints, and in the Lebanese Ministry of Defence at Yarsi. It also follows on peaceful demonstrators from Nahr al Bared who bravely tried to tell the world what was happening being shot dead near Baddawi. The world ignored completely even their deaths.

Amnesty International, the largest human rights organisation in the world was concluding a report on the situation of Palestinians in Lebanon during the past week. It's delegation left Lebanon without seeing Nahr Al Bared --before it left holding a Beirut press conference which was abruptly ended at the first mention of Nahr Al Bared.

The United States Government played a key role in this battle, strongly supporting politically and with munitions the Lebanese government's decision to seek a military solution. The Lebanese offered to Fatah Al Islam simply to surrender or die. The European Union and many Arab countries also clearly supported this approach. The moral and legal imperative to distinguish between combatants and civilians, and not to target civilian communities was not a concern. The Palestinians of Lebanon, the subject of so many crocodile tears from around the world during infamous massacres in the past, once again are without support at the moment when it might actually matter.

What happened in Nahr al Bared? Why does the world not seem to care?

Michael Birmingham is an Irish peace activist who has been mostly based in Lebanon since July 2006. He has formerly worked on human rights and social justice in Ireland and Iraq.

Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Palestine
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Jeudi 25 octobre 2007 4 25 10 2007 10:02
Shin Bet prevented medical care to Palestinian cancer patient
By Amira Hass, Haaretz Correspondent

The Shin Bet is refusing to allow a 21-year-old Rafiah man who is sick with cancer and in need of immediate medical care to come to Israel, even though he obtained permission from the Israeli Defense Forces' Coordination and Liaison Administration.

The Shin Bet also arrested the patient's father, who accompanied him to the hospital.

Mahmoud Abu Taha was diagnosed with cancer of the small intestine in August 2007. Treatment in Gaza was unsuccessful, and he lost a third of his body weight. In addition, he is not taking all of the vitamins he needs because of the shortage of medications in Gazan hospitals.
Because of his serious condition, the doctors decided to postpone chemotherapy and send him to Tel HaShomer hospital in Ramat Gan. According to Mahmoud's brother, Hanni Abu Taleh, on October 18, they received permission shortly after they filed a request with the IDF. The father and his sick son drove in an ambulance to Erez Crossing, and after a half-hour wait, the father's name was called on the loudspeaker.

According to the brother, the patient continued to wait in the ambulance, lying on a stretcher and attached to an oxygen tank and an infusion. After two hours, it was announced on the loudspeaker that he was denied entrance into Israel.

They returned to the hospital in Khan Yunis. At the same time, a person who identified himself as an officer with the Shin Bet called Hanni and told him that his father had been arrested.

The family filed another request for Mahmoud to come for medical treatment at Tel HaShomer, but they still have not received a reply.

The Shin Bet maintains that "Abu Taha arrived at the Erez Crossing during a specific warning of a terror attack at the border crossing. Due to the fact that it was not allowed to carry out a security check on him, he was prevented from exiting to Israel."

The Shin Bet also said that the father of Mahmoud was arrested on suspicion of involvement in terror acitivites.
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Palestine
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Jeudi 25 octobre 2007 4 25 10 2007 09:59
Livni behind closed doors: Iran nukes pose little threat to Israel
By Gidi Weitz and Na'ama Lanski, Haaretz Correspondents

Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni said a few months ago in a series of closed discussions that in her opinion that Iranian nuclear weapons do not pose an existential threat to Israel, Haaretz magazine reveals in an article on Livni to be published Friday.

Livni also criticized the exaggerated use that Prime Minister Ehud Olmert is making of the issue of the Iranian bomb, claiming that he is attempting to rally the public around him by playing on its most basic fears. Last week, former Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy said similar things about Iran.

The article also reveals for the first time a document Livni prepared and sent to Olmert a few months after the Second Lebanon War proposing a new division of labor between the two. "Enclosed is a proposal for work procedures between us, with the aim of providing an answer to Israel's strategic needs and facilitating early planning and the formulation of coordinated Israeli positions ... within the framework of cooperative
r
elations, full transparency and continuous mutual updates," wrote Livni.

She described in the document a number of required arrangements: "The prime minister and the foreign minister will hold regular work meetings at least once a week." In an allusion to her absence form critical discussions during the war in Lebanon, she wrote: "The foreign minister will be invited to meetings with the prime minister on security matters and other meetings with serious implications."

The most important part of the document relates to the talks with the Palestinians. Livni wrote: "The foreign minister shall represent the prime minister and the government of Israel, and will act on their behalf as the director of the dialogue with the relevant Palestinian representatives, and in accordance with the policy and methods to be coordinated in advance with the prime minster, while keeping him informed."

It is reasonable to assume that Olmert's decision to appoint Livni as head of the negotiating team with the Palestinians at the Annapolis summit is connected to the document.

The Haaretz article also reveals for the first time a draft of a document prepared for Livni by her advisor, Dr. Tal Becker of the Foreign Ministry, who is slated to serve as a senior member of the negotiating team with the Palestinians. The draft, named the Diplomatic Horizon, is pessimistic about the chances of reaching a permanent solution in the near future.
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Iran
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Mercredi 24 octobre 2007 3 24 10 2007 14:51

From the ashes of fundamentalism

The Lebanese novelist Elias Khoury sees a way forward through separation of religion and state, and acceptance of diversity.

October 15, 2007 7:30 PM | Printable version

The first time I read about Elias Khoury, I was surprised to find that this award-winning Lebanese novelist had not only espoused the power of the pen (literally - he does not use keyboards), but also that of the bullet.

One does not readily associate eloquent, fantasy novel-writing with real-life militancy. When I interviewed Khoury at a public meeting in London last week it was hard to believe that this quiet, silver-haired man of such a small frame had enlisted in Fatah - the largest resistance group in the Palestine Liberation Organisation - in the 1970s, and fought in the last Lebanese civil war.

In view of the current volatility in the Middle East, I must admit that I was more interested in hearing about Khoury's political views than his renowned literature, and the audience seemed to agree. In particular, I found his background take on pan-Arabism intriguing, deeply cynical and yet somehow hopeful.

The Arab national movement seems to have died multiple deaths, according to Khoury. The first was due to the Sykes-Picot agreement that resulted in the British and French division of the Arab world after the first world war. Then there was the 1948 Nakba ("catastrophe") - when Israel was established on the ruins of Palestine - and the Arab military dictatorships that followed. He also cited the failure in 1961 of the union between Egypt and Syria, "because this type of military Arab nationalism based on dictatorship couldn't work".

The final death knell of the pan-Arab national movement was the military defeat at the hands of Israel in 1967. What has filled the void since then is fundamentalism, "a very complicated phenomenon" created by "the Saudis, Americans and Pakistanis with oil money to fight the last battle against the Soviet Union in Afghanistan," he added.

Fundamentalism is taking the region to "a new catastrophe, the worst one," which is a Sunni-Shia war, said Khoury, a Christian who describes himself as having an Islamic background, who used to go to church and read the Qur'an at the same time. He warned "our Israeli cousins" not to wish for such an outcome, for this would lead the region, including Israel, to self-destruction.

The Arab media is among the victims of fundamentalism and dictatorship, according to Khoury. "The pan-Arab newspapers are Saudi, and the pan-Arab satellite TV stations are either Saudi or Qatari, which means that all the media is under the control of a fundamentalist ideology," he said. "And the media is under the service of regimes."

The Arab world is in a deep darkness, Khoury added, due to several factors: "Israeli occupation and humiliation of the Palestinian people, mainly"; "dictatorships that are becoming more and more savage" (citing Syria's current role in Lebanon, and the Egyptian republic's transformation "into a kind of monarchy"); and the US invasion of Iraq, "which is leading to a total chaotic system in the Middle East". Describing the invasion as not an error but a crime, he continued: "This is not the way to get rid of a dictatorship. This is the way to create from one dictator hundreds of dictators that you are seeing in Iraq nowadays."

Khoury even called into question the viability of the region's nations. "The idea of the nation state can't work in our societies because the nation state needs a kind of ethnic purification," he said, citing Turkey's massacres of the Armenians and Israel's ethnic cleansing of the Palestinians. He said the kind of problems being seen in Iraq and Lebanon could occur at any time in Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, and North Africa between Arabs and Berbers.

The only solution for the region is "a rational, secular, democratic approach towards politics and culture," according to Khoury, who has put his money where his mouth is, so to speak, with his involvement in the establishment of the Democratic Left Movement, one of the few political parties in Lebanon calling for a secular state.

"We have to invent a political system that separates religion and state, accepts diversity, and goes back to the idea that Arabic culture was never one-dimensional," he said.

Current Arab literature is going some way towards this, whereby one can pick up an Arabic novel and tell from its style and content where the author is from, according to Khoury, who has written 11 novels. "This is a very important step towards accepting and promoting diversity in Arabic culture." Such diversity must be the basis for unity, he added.

Khoury says his prescription, which "might have been popular 30 years ago," is now "totally unpopular in the Arab world". He believes, however, that the experiences of fundamentalism will bring about a resurgence in his way of thinking. "This is a long struggle and my feeling is that we have to begin again from scratch, but we have no other choice."

And the prospects for this struggle? "I'm hopeful, but history is hopeless."


Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Interviews
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Mardi 23 octobre 2007 2 23 10 2007 13:12

Stop Playing Their Game

Time to Boycott Voting

By JOEL S. HIRSCHBORN

After many years of political disappointment, more progressives, liberals and conservatives -- and certainly moderates and independents -- know in their hearts that voting for Democrats or Republicans is a waste. Just imagine if voter turnout was cut to 25 percent or less! Let the whole world see Americans boycotting a broken and corrupt political system and rejecting what has become a delusional democracy. To keep voting in an unjust political system makes us willing political slaves that the rich and powerful elites exploit.

Just leaving the major parties is not good enough and, besides, most Americans are not party members. We need a bolder strategy. We must humiliate the political elites in both major parties and the corporate interests that support both of them. We can send a shock wave throughout the political establishment by not voting in the 2008 presidential election.

Stop playing THEIR game. Take back control. Take back YOUR nation. Time to boycott voting. This strategy is consistent with the thinking of Gandhi and King: peaceful resistance to political tyranny that can bring the corrupt system to its knees. Ultimately, the most effective protest is through civil disobedience -- to visibly and stubbornly refuse to respect what has become a corrupt, untrustworthy system. Before it can be fixed it must be deconstructed and then rebuilt. Taxation with MISrepresentation means we need a Second American Revolution; it must begin -- not with violent action -- but with massive withdrawal by citizens that have seen the light. We have a good head start with about half of eligible voters already so turned off that they don't vote. Obviously that has not been sufficient to change the system.

There will be negative, defensive knee-jerk reactions to this audacious strategy. Let's examine them:

Many will think that taking such action violates our responsibility as citizens. But taking that responsibility seriously as engaged citizens in the Jeffersonian sense must reflect that there is still a valid contract between citizens and their government. When we vote we have the right to a political system that respects we the people and gives us an authentic representative democracy. We have a right to a constitutional republic operating under the rule of law. But we have elected representatives that no longer have the public interest as their primary commitment, nor truly honor and respect our Constitution.

They have been corrupted by corporate and other special interests that fund their campaigns to get the laws, loopholes and largesse they want. They have been corrupted by power and the perks of office. They are political cowards and mostly intellectual midgets. The two major parties have a stranglehold on our political system that no longer merits our participation in their crooked game. Political parties are not part of our Constitution and the two-party duopoly has demonstrated that both Democrats and Republicans put their own interests above those of we the people, our nation and our democracy. We cannot vote our way out of our current, dreadful political system.

Whether you are on the political left or right, you will fear that not voting will help put in office people that support policies your abhor. But decades of objective political reality tell us that even people from the party that we align with do not, when elected, fulfill their promises and our hopes. Sadly, most Americans have become lesser-evil voters, deluding themselves that this is the best, least worse, yet awful choice. Instead of feeling bad about voting for candidates that we know in our hearts are not worthy of our votes and public office, we must have the courage to say "enough is enough; I will not play in this shameful game any longer." We must stop legitimizing and abetting our disgraceful government.

Many may fear that not voting sets a terrible example to children. But isn't it more important to tell America's children that true patriotism must reveal itself by rejecting a political system that no longer merits respect? Thomas Jefferson believed in periodic rebellion. Now is the time for all good Americans to come to the rescue of their nation, peacefully by boycotting elections.

The small number of third party members may be screaming: yes, don't vote for Democrats and Republicans; come over and join us! I have been a strong third party supporter, but we must face the painful truth. The two major parties have so rigged the political system in their favor and against third parties that voting for third party candidates for federal office is a futile action. We must first boycott voting to create sufficient pressure to open the system to genuine political competition. That requires a number of electoral reforms, possible if the nation gets its first Article V convention. With reforms we can increase voter turnout to over 90 percent, as routinely seen in other democracies.

False patriotism may cause some to think that we must not show anti-American nations and terrorists that our government no longer has the trust of its citizens. But that has already been widely disseminated by endless polls and surveys, including the recent Zogby poll that found a record-low 11 percent support for Congress. Better to show our enemies that we the people have finally awakened and decided to re-assert our sovereignty and restore American democracy. Loyalty to country, yes; loyalty to government, no. Our populist American insurgency must begin with a boycott of voting.

Proof that this extraordinary strategy can work is that by now diehard Democrats and Republicans reading this are squirming in discomfort. So spread the word, if you have not deluded yourself about voting the nation into a far, far better place. Time to boycott voting. Join the picket line; admit that none of the above is the only rational decision when the choices the two major parties give us for federal officials are not worth a dime.

Voting in a delusional representative democracy is as harebrained as voting even though you know votes will not be honestly counted -- which many fear may be true. We may have lost control of our government, but we still control our voting. Time to walk away from the brainwashing and fiction that it really matters which Democrat or Republican you vote for in primaries and general elections for federal office. Power elites want us to believe that. They collude with the corporate mainstream media that make tons of money from campaigns and want you to stay glued to suspenseful horse races. Loud-mouth political pundits that narrate the races are democracy's enemies. We must stop watching and listening to the political entertainment designed to keep us obediently mesmerized, as if the game is honest. Without an audience, these phony races and media circus will disappear.

Don't be fooled by the large number of candidates in the Democratic and Republican presidential primaries. It is a sham -- a scheme to keep spectators glued to the illusory competition. Ron Paul has as much chance of being the Republican nominee as Dennis Kucinich has of being the Democratic nominee. With power elites controlling both major parties, zero chance for them and the other minor candidates, regardless of their grassroots support. Reflect on how both major parties accept lots of candidates in televised debates in the primary season. But come the general election with prime time televised presidential debates they keep out third party candidates that desperately need that exposure to rally meaningful support. Such is the hypocrisy and disdain of the two-party duopoly.

Come Election Day in 2008 we should party and celebrate (with TVs turned off) our populist boycott of voting and enjoy the camaraderie of fellow patriots. We must help them resist any late urge to vote, because by then millions of dollars will be spent by many special interests to make us feel guilty and ashamed if we do not vote. I can hear Paul Revere now: The liars are coming! The liars are coming! All that advertising and pundit-screaming to herd us back into the voting booths will verify that our boycott strategy works.

With having the votes of only a small minority of the electorate, whoever becomes president will have no public mandate except major, systemic political reforms that satisfy the will of the people. Either that or accept being the president of a fake democracy on the world scene.

Be brave. Stick together. Save voting for a reformed political system worthy of respect and participation.

Joel S. Hirschhorn is the author of Delusional Democracy -- Fixing the Republic Without Overthrowing the Government that presents many electoral and other reforms. Formerly, he was a senior official at the Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the National Governors Association. He can be contacted through his website: www.delusionaldemocracy.com.
Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : Politics
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Mardi 23 octobre 2007 2 23 10 2007 11:28

                                                                Paris, le 22 octobre 2007

COMMUNIQUE DE PRESSE

L’Organisation de Libération de la Palestine (O.L.P.) en sa qualité de représentant légitime et unique du peuple palestinien, et par le biais de sa Déléguée Générale de Palestine en France, vient de décider d’intervenir au procès engagé contre les sociétés ALSTOM et VEOLIA TRANSPORT par l’Association France Palestine Solidarité (A.F.P.S.) devant le Tribunal de Grande Instance de NANTERRE aux fins de demander, avec l’A.F.P.S., l’annulation du contrat passé par les deux sociétés avec le Gouvernement israélien pour la construction du tramway dans les territoires occupés, mais également l’interdiction à ces sociétés de poursuivre l’exécution de ce contrat.

 

En effet, suite à un appel d’offres international lancé par Israël en vue de la construction d’une ligne de tramway reliant la ville de Jérusalem-Ouest à des colonies israéliennes de Cisjordanie occupée, le consortium CITY PASS, constitué notamment par les sociétés ALSTOM et VEOLIA TRANSPORT, s’est vu attribuer le marché et c’est ainsi que les deux sociétés se sont vu confier, en 2005, la construction et l’exploitation pendant trente ans du réseau du tramway.

 

Or, ce tramway constituera, si ce n’est un moyen, pour le moins un facteur d’expansion de la colonisation de Jérusalem-Est par l’Etat d’Israël.

 

En cela, la convention signée entre le Gouvernement israélien et les sociétés ALSTOM et VEOLIA TRANSPORT est totalement contraire aux dispositions de la convention de Genève du 12 août 1949 qui interdit non seulement à un Etat occupant de transférer une partie de sa propre population civile dans le territoire occupé, mais également la démolition de tous biens mobiliers ou immobiliers par l’occupant sauf lorsque ces destructions sont rendues absolument nécessaires par des opérations militaires, ce qui n’est bien évidemment pas le cas pour le tramway.

 

La communauté internationale (notamment  les Etats-Unis d’Amérique et l'Union Européenne, en particulier la France) est – et a toujours été – claire et bien déterminée quant au refus total de la colonisation à l'intérieur des territoires palestiniens occupés depuis 1967 y compris Jérusalem-Est.

 

Il est important de rappeler à ce stade que la résolution 242 du Conseil de Sécurité des Nations unies, et toutes les résolutions ultérieures en la matière, ont considéré la partie Est de la ville de Jérusalem, et plus précisément la vieille ville de Jérusalem comme étant partie intégrante des territoires de la Cisjordanie et de Gaza qu'Israël a occupés à l'issue de la guerre de 1967. Les Nations unies n'ont d'ailleurs jamais cessé de contester toute action touchant le statut de la ville de Jérusalem.

 

Israël continue aujourd'hui et après 40 ans d'occupation de défier toutes les lois et résolutions internationales. Tout récemment encore, les mesures annoncées par le gouvernement israélien (construction de 20.000 logements pour les colons dans Jérusalem-Est, le retrait de milliers de cartes d'identité à des Palestiniens de Jérusalem, l'imposition excessive sur les commerces de la ville de Jérusalem-Est, la continuation de la construction du mur, la confiscation de terres palestiniennes à l'est de Jérusalem sans parler des difficultés d'obtention des permis de construction ou de restructuration des anciennes demeures) ont pour effet d'accentuer la coupure nord-sud de la Cisjordanie et d'isoler Jérusalem-Est qui doit être la capitale de l'Etat palestinien.

 

La construction du tramway et le contrat y afférant s'inscrivent dans cette politique et contribuent à empêcher le peuple palestinien à exercer son droit de disposer de lui-même.

 

 

PS : Pour tout renseignement additionnel, contacter :

        Safwat Tél :  33 1 48 28 66 00

                             33 6 65 70 09 20

        e-mail : del.palestine.press@orange.fr

Par Duffer2222 - Publié dans : City Pass Tramway
Ecrire un commentaire - Voir les commentaires - Recommander
Créer un blog sur over-blog.com - Contact - C.G.U. - Rémunération en droits d'auteur - Signaler un abus